Lawmakers are proposing a measure to ensure that companies involved in the development of problematic generative AI are held responsible for their actions by removing their legal protection. Senators Richard Blumenthal and Josh Hawley have put forward the No Section 230 Immunity for AI Act, which seeks to prevent firms like OpenAI and Google from utilizing Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act to evade liability for harmful content and evade legal action. Under this proposed legislation, if an individual uses AI technology, such as deepfake images or audio clips, to tarnish someone’s reputation, both the tool developer and the user could be held accountable.
Hawley describes the bill as a means to compel AI creators to “take ownership of their business decisions” during the development of their products. He also presents this legislation as an initial step towards establishing rules and safety measures for AI. In a recent hearing focusing on the impact of AI on human rights, Blumenthal urged Congress to curtail the broad protections afforded to social networks by Section 230, which shield them from legal repercussions.
In May, Blumenthal and Hawley held a hearing where prominent figures in the industry, such as OpenAI’s CEO Sam Altman, called on the government to take action regarding AI. Industry leaders have already advocated for a temporary halt to AI experimentation and have drawn comparisons between the unchecked risks posed by AI and the dangers of nuclear warfare.
For years, Congress has been pushing for reforms to Section 230 in an attempt to rein in tech companies, particularly due to concerns that major internet platforms might knowingly permit harmful content. A House bill proposed in 2021 aimed to hold businesses liable if they intentionally employed algorithms that caused emotional or physical harm. However, these bills have stalled, and Section 230 has remained intact. Lawmakers have achieved more success in implementing age verification requirements that theoretically reduce mental health issues among younger internet users.
Subscribe to the BuyTechBlog Deals Newsletter
Get exclusive discounts on consumer electronics delivered directly to your inbox, curated by BuyTechBlog’s editorial team. Check out the latest deals.
Subscribe
By subscribing, you agree to BuyTechBlog’s Terms and Privacy Policy.
The likelihood of this bill’s success remains uncertain. Blumenthal and Hawley have a track record of introducing online content bills that fail to gain significant support, such as the child safety-focused EARN IT Act and Hawley’s anti-addiction SMART Act. In addition to persuading their fellow senators, they will need a corresponding House bill that can withstand a vote to pass into law.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) about AI liability
What is the purpose of the Senate bill mentioned in the text?
The purpose of the Senate bill is to hold AI companies accountable for harmful content by removing their legal protection under Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act. This aims to prevent companies from evading liability for content created using their AI technology.
How will the proposed legislation impact AI developers and users?
If the legislation is passed, AI developers will be required to take responsibility for their business decisions and potentially face legal consequences for the harmful use of their AI technology. Users who utilize AI tools, such as deepfake images or sound bites, to damage someone’s reputation may also be held accountable for their actions.
What other measures have been proposed to regulate tech companies and online content?
Various measures have been proposed, including age verification requirements to reduce mental health issues among young users. Additionally, past bills have aimed to hold businesses liable if they knowingly use algorithms causing harm and have sought to reform Section 230 to rein in tech companies’ actions regarding harmful content.
What are the concerns surrounding AI and its unchecked risks?
Industry leaders have raised concerns about the potential dangers of unchecked AI, comparing it to the risks associated with nuclear warfare. These concerns highlight the need for rules, regulations, and safety measures to mitigate the potential negative impact of AI technology.
Has previous legislation targeting online content gained support?
Previous bills introduced by the same senators have faced challenges in gaining significant support. The success of this particular bill remains uncertain, as it would require support from fellow senators and a corresponding House bill that withstands a vote to become law.
More about AI liability
- No Section 230 Immunity for AI Act – Official information about the proposed Senate bill.
- Communications Decency Act, Section 230 – Full text of Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act.
- EARN IT Act – Information about the EARN IT Act introduced by Senator Hawley.
- SMART Act – Details about Senator Hawley’s SMART Act focused on anti-addiction measures.
- OpenAI – Official website of OpenAI, one of the AI companies mentioned in the text.
- BuyTechBlog – Website mentioned in the text offering consumer electronics deals and newsletter subscription.
5 comments
oh boy, here we go again with politicians tryin to mess with AI companies. this bill sounds like trouble, takin away legal protection from those firms. wonder if it’ll actually pass tho?
finally! someone tryna make AI companies accountable for their mess. bout time they take responsibility for what their tech does. hope this bill gets support and becomes law.
Interesting to see the concerns about AI’s unchecked risks being compared to nuclear war. It’s a whole different kind of threat, but it’s clear that regulations and safety measures are needed. Let’s hope they find the right balance.
Blumenthal and Hawley seem to have a hard time gaining support for their bills. Maybe they should rethink their approach or find better ways to address the issues they care about. It’s not easy getting things done in Congress!
Ugh! The lack of proper grammar and punctuation in this text is giving me a headache. Can’t they write clearly and professionally? It’s important to communicate effectively, especially when discussing legislation.